Saturday, February 26, 2011

Phony Facebook Page Spreads Quickly

From:
http://www.pennlive.com/editorials/index.ssf/2011/02/post_96.html


 Saturday, February 26, 2011

This week, someone in Pennsylvania created a page on the popular social media site and titled it “Beaver County Hoez.” It included about two dozen photos of girls ages 13 to college age taken from their Facebook photo collections. 
computer3.jpg

The photos themselves were fairly innocent. A few girls were in cheerleading uniforms. Another young woman was hugging her boyfriend. A few others were just smiling — the kind of pictures many people use as their “profile photos.” But the creator of “Beaver County Hoez” took the seemingly innocuous photos and put captions underneath them with sexually explicit references and wild stories.
In a matter of hours, people started commenting on the photos. From there, it all went downhill. The page received more than 3,000 views before Facebook took it down and state police started an investigation. The damage was done.
The young women, many of whom are in high school and college, became objects of school gossip even though the stories about them were false.
By now, most Facebook and social media users are smart enough to know not to post outlandish photos of themselves — ones of excessive partying or anything else that might bring unwelcome attention or harm a college or job application.
But how do you protect against something akin to the Beaver County incident?
Some might say security settings. Facebook does give users the ability to restrict their profiles so that only selected people can view images (or anything else) on their pages. The trouble is the Beaver County page appears to have been an “inside job.” The photos could easily have been pulled by someone who was a “friend.”
It would be almost impossible to protect yourself entirely from a similar situation unless there are no photos of you online — that includes on Facebook, LinkedIn, your business site or in media.
Sites such as Facebook have people who monitor for inappropriate material. It’s just that it took Facebook a few days to pick up on this one. The creator of Beaver County Hoez clearly knew how to go around the basic word screens sites use. Too often online, something can explode before an administrative team can catch it.
Given the nature of the Internet, this kind of behavior is impossible to stop entirely, but I am leaning to the conclusion that the legal system has to allow for easier prosecution of libel online. Ideally whoever created the Facebook page will be held accountable. The tricky part is finding the name of the person who did it.
The creator listed him or herself only as “Beaver County Hoez.” To set up a Facebook page, it takes only a functioning e-mail address. The rest of the information could be falsified. It’s similar on many social interaction sites. 
Heather Long15.JPGHeather Long

There’s certainly no verification of identity from an e-mail address, especially ones such as “crazyguy1107” that can be created on Yahoo or Gmail. Police, however, have been tracking the computers used to create the page.
The only other option I see is to start holding host sites at least marginally responsible. In case law so far, that has not happened. Media websites — think New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Twitter, PennLive — are not held accountable for libel done by third party posters. They are protected under the Communications Decency Act.
“The idea behind the Act is to have enough protection to facilitate public comment,” says Melissa Melewsky, counsel at the Pennsylvania Newspaper Association.
Most of these sites (PennLive included) don’t abuse that leeway. They have policies of taking down inappropriate posts and blocking problem users.
But time can make all the difference online. What is particularly terrifying in the Beaver County case is the shrewdness of the person who created the page. He or she understood the ins and outs of monitoring and security settings as well as how to escape repercussions (thus far).
While I understand that platforms such as Facebook cannot stop every “bad” webpage, there should be a requirement that sites must respond to any user (or police) warnings about inappropriate content within a reasonable time frame.
On the Internet, that reasonable time frame has to be hours, not days. Just ask the girls from Beaver County whose lives are shattered from something posted for a few days.

"Friend" Kills "Friend"

From:
http://hollandzeeland.wzzm13.com/news/news/zeeland-teenager-accused-killing-facebook-friend/53671


Zeeland teenager accused of killing Facebook friend

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Life Lesson for Rodney: Don't Brag About Stealing on Facebook

From:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1359952/The-stupid-criminal-pleads-guilty-burglary-stole-laptop-posted-photo-owners-Facebook.html?ito=feeds-newsxml



Stupid criminal pleads guilty to burglary after he stole a laptop and posted photo of himself on owner's Facebook

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 6:23 PM on 23rd February 2011

He didn't exactly stand much chance of getting away with it.

And yesterday the man described as 'the most stupid criminal ever', who stole a laptop then posted a leering photo of himself on its owner's Facebook page, pleaded guilty to burglary in Washington D.C.

Last December, Rodney Knight Jr, 19, broke into the home of  Washington Post journalist Marc Fisher and stole his 15-year-old son's laptop computer, $400, a winter coat and another laptop.
His own wanted poster: Rodney Knight Jr not only broke into a house and stole a laptop, but then posted a picture of himself on its owner's Facebook page
His own wanted poster: Rodney Knight Jr not only broke into a house and stole a laptop, but then posted a picture of himself on its owner's Facebook page

Except to rub salt in the wound, as well as stealing the family's property, Knight also decided to taunt them with his very own calling card.

At the time, Mr Fisher described how the burglar broke into his family's Washington D.C. home and kicked through the basement door while they was out.

Mr Fisher wrote: 'He opened my son's computer, took a photo of himself sneering as he pointed to the cash lifted from my son's desk, and then went on my son's Facebook account and posted the picture for 400 teenagers to see.

'In the picture, the man is wearing my new winter coat, the one that was stolen right out of the Macy's box it had just arrived in.'

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Chicago Driver Sued for Updating Facebook Page During Fatal Crash

From:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20032270-504083.html

Posted by Caroline Black

February 16, 2011


A 21-year-old Chicago motorist has been hit with a wrongful death lawsuit after she allegedly struck and killed a 70-year-old man while attempting to update her Facebook page on her cell phone.
The daughter of the victim, Raymond Veloz, filed the suit Monday in Cook County Circuit Court claiming that Araceli Beas' Facebook page showed an update posted at 7:54 a.m. on Dec. 7, 2010 - the same time that Veloz's cell phone records showed a call being made to 911.
Veloz's daughter Regina Cabrales alleges in her suit that Beas operated her vehicle without keeping a proper and sufficient focus, drove while using an electronic communication device and failed to slow down to avoid an accident, reports CBS affiliate WBBM.
Beas' mother, Rosario Rodriguez, came to her daughter's defense claiming that she posted the Facebook update as she sat in her car while waiting for it to warm up outside her boyfriend's home two miles away from where the crash occurred, reports The Chicago Tribune.
Beas told police that she had been temporarily blinded by the sun at the time of the collision.
Beas was ticketed for striking a pedestrian in the roadway, a Chicago police spokesman said, according to CBS affiliate WBBM. 
Veloz had exited his vehicle after getting into a minor accident with another motorist around 7:30 a.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 7. He was standing near the other driver's vehicle exchanging information when he was struck by Beas, says WBBM.
Veloz was pronounced dead around 9:30 a.m. at a nearby hospital, says The Tribune.
Cabrales is asking for an unspecified amount of money.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

The Anti-Facebook Revolution

From:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/claire-gordon/the-antifacebook-revoluti_b_819968.html


Claire Gordon

Claire Gordon

Posted: February 10, 2011

Last Saturday, a quarter million people woke up to find themselves looking for love. Some of them were single, others in relationships. Some were Argentinian, some were Dutch, and a few liked Kings of Leon. A sizable chunk were smug and many more easy-going. But all of them were united in having no clue what was going on.

Face-to-Facebook
 is a project by Paolo Cirio and Alessandro Ludovico. The two artists stole one million Facebook profiles, filtered them through face-recognition software, selected their 250,000 favorites, grouped them by facial expression (smug, climber, funny, easy-going etc.) and uploaded them to a custom-made dating website, Lovely Faces.
Facebook is too crowded to be a home, claim Cirio and Ludovico, and too familiar to be a street. It's an "eternal, illusory party." And they decided to crash it.
Face-to-Facebook, like ICanStalkU.com, shows users the kind of information they have inadvertently seeped into the public sphere, and the ways a third party could nefariously or hilariously make use of it.
Within hours, many of these unsuspecting love-seekers sent Cirio and Ludovico enraged messages. Facebook sent a message too - a cease-and-desist letter - because the artists (activists, pirates, assholes) had raided their data.
Mark Zuckerberg knows exactly how wrong this is, having pillaged Harvard's system back in the day to create his Facebook prototype, FaceMash.
Facebook's privacy controversy last year piqued the collective consciousness about online security. On Facebook and many other sites, we re-embody ourselves through data and surrender our data bodies to the powers that be.
A lot of people find this terrifying and a lot of people don't. A lot of people care, but aren't sure why and a lot of people don't care and aren't sure why. I, for one, while not so perturbed, also know that future me is often disappointed by present me's decision-making. I am therefore withholding judgment.
But Google hasn't.
Clicking to import your Gmail contacts to Facebook, you will see a "Trap my contacts now" warning page, asking if you're "super sure." Google then invites you to register a complaint about "data protectionism."
Anti-Facebook sentiment gained momentum in 2009, when tens of thousands of people left the website all together. As Paolo Virno said, "nothing is less passive than the act of fleeing," and thousands of users have begun voting with their feet. Or rather, their index fingers.
Seppukoo was founded a couple years ago to assist you in your virtual suicide - simply log in and your Facebook page is ritually immolated post by post. "Go Seppukoo!" the homepage urged. "Have a really cool radical chic experience."
Seppukoo employed the same viral strategy as Facebook itself, in order to transform an individual act of defection into a collective exodus. Seppukoo, like Face-to-Facebook, received a cease-and-desist letter. Its crime: Users willingly gave the website their data, which is Facebook's property. Soon after Seppukoo's URL was blocked from Facebook, Seppukoo itself went to the grave.
Four young programmers took a more uplifting approach to the Facebook dilemma last year. Their vision was of a truly peer-to-peer social network, without info bounced through a "faceless hub," and where privacy and openness could cheerfully coexist. They named it Diaspora.
It began as an idea proposed on Kickstarter, the micro-credit website that invites individuals to pledge small money to sponsor projects, in exchange for token gifts. Diaspora hoped to raise $10,000. After that was met, people continued to donate. Diaspora managed to raise close to twenty times their goal, from 6,200 different contributors. A Kickstarter record.
As decentralized, open-source software, Diaspora lets people control their own data, as well as the very architecture of the platform. Although still in its alpha phase, Diaspora has made such radical moves as making its Gender a text field, as opposed to a binary drop-down menu.
But the reality is, most people will not shift their accounts to Diaspora or commit Seppukoo. Last year saw the first Quit Facebook Day, but even that hardly tickled the beast.
The Internet landscape people encounter is increasingly signposted by brands as monolithic and inescapable as the billboards on a US interstate... Google, Amazon, Ebay, Facebook. Only a small slice of web-surfers will ever plunge into the Internet's countercultural depths.
This means a real revolution may have to come from inside the house.
Facebook Resistance is plotting the insurrection. The plan is to scramble the website's homogenized layout, which tidied the messiness and creativity of a Geocities or a Myspace into a 2.0 repository of economically valuable data.
"It's like if everyone's living room had the same Ikea furniture," said Tobias Leingruber, the artist spearheading Facebook Resistance.
Leingruber has already designed several artistic, prankish and borderline illegal browser extensions, including the China Channel, which lets you experience the Internet as if you were in China, and Pirates of the Amazon, which let Amazon browsers easily download for free the products they were thinking of buying.
Hacktivists can already use plug-ins to manipulate Facebook's code. But the reworked designs exist only locally on your own computer, which isn't so much fun. If someone else downloads the plug-in, however, every act of vandalism becomes visible to them too.
This has already happened with the Dislike Button (not the fake, spammy one, but the actual one). Already one million people, Leingruber claims, have downloaded the plug-in and "disliking" is part of their Facebook reality.
Other viral acts of vandalism in the works include custom wallpapers, a gender spectrum slider, the ability to list multiple romantic partners and to manically graffiti your friend's wall.
Some of the ideas are political, while others are as pointed as a kid with a crayon. But the idea is to restore fundamental principles that Facebook, and other sites like it, threaten: The importance of being anyone and not just someone, and of taking control of your online identity, before someone comes along and tags you as "smug." 

Monday, February 7, 2011

Man arrested for soliciting sex with minors

From:
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/242894/147/Man-arrested-for-soliciting-sex-with-minors

Feb 7, 2011




Columbia, IL (KSDK) - Columbia, Illinois police arrested 28-year-old Roy Browne last Friday. He's accused of soliciting sex from minors.
Police Chief Joe Edwards Joe Edwards said Browne used Facebook to connect with two boys, 15 and 16 years old. Edwards said Browne got their phone numbers from their pages online and began texting them sexually laced messages.
The 16-year-old told his mother what was going on, and they brought the issue to the attention of police. They then turned over a cell phone and a laptop to police.
Authorities set up a meeting with Browne at the library. They posed as the boys online, and once Browne approached the unmarked car, he was arrested.
"With the ability to access the internet and the ability to access Facebook, and knowing what we know that young kids put info out there that they shouldn't, and in reviewing Browne's Facebook account and seeing 1,512 friends, we're deeply concerned that a number of them are young juveniles," said Edwards.
The boys never had face-to-face contact with Browne; however, police fear he could've tried to reach more minors.
Browne has been charged with two counts of indecent solicitation of a child. He's being held in the Monroe County Jail on $10,000 bond.

Facebook is NOT big in Japan

From:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/02/07/BUVU1HJV80.DTL


Number of the day

1.7%
That's the portion of the Japanese population that uses Facebook, according to Socialbakers, which tracks online statistics. Facebook is far less popular in Japan than in nearly every other developed country. In the United States, for example, almost half of the population uses the site. Many Japanese prefer a service called Mixi, which has 10 times as many users as Facebook in the country. While Facebook is growing in Japan, it isn't expected to challenge Mixi's dominance.


mixi, Inc. (ミクシィ Mikushī,) is one of several social networking websites in Japan. As of May 2008, mixi had over 21.6 million users and an 80% share of the social networking market in Japan. Founded by Kenji Kasahara, under E-Mercury, Inc. (actually Mixi, Inc.). The focus of Mixi is "community entertainment", that is, meeting new people by way of common interests. As is typical of social networking sites, users can send and receive messages, write in a diary, read and comment on others' diaries, organize and join communities and invite their friends.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Is the Facebook Fad Ending at Last?

From:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/02/01/facebook-losing-focus/


By John R. Quain
Published February 01, 2011


  1. It has a stratospheric valuation, an Oscar-nominated movie about it, 600 million fans, and its CEO just appeared on Saturday Night Live. So where's Facebook going to go from here? Down.
  2. Okay, so maybe not right away.
  3. But it certainly feels like the social-networking site is beginning to sag under its own ponderous weight and prodigious Netscape-era hype. In fact, Facebook is so overhyped that a recent $1.5 billion injection of capital from Goldman, Sachs and others meant it now has an estimated market valuation of approximately $50 billion. 
  4. Indeed, Facebook could be even bigger based on trading in the secondary market (the one for wealthy folks) where according to SharesPost the company is worth over $82 billion -- making it more valuable than Amazon.com.
  5. But it seems like Facebook's days may already be numbered. Why? Facebook started out as a simple, fun place to digitally cavort and post silly, unflattering pictures of one another. It quickly transformed into a miasma of lurking dangers, threats to our personal security and safety, and a great way to get fired -- or worse, prosecuted for goodness-knows-what. Everyone should be a little more cautious about the "social" part of social networking, these days, and for good reason.


  6. Jilted partners use Facebook to stalk the objects of their unrequited love. Mean girls use it for cyberbullying. Avaricious divorce lawyers use it to skewer fighting couples and tip the balance in child-custody battles. The police use it to catch criminals. Criminals use it to find out when victims are away from home and rob them. With FB friends like these, who needs FB?
  7. Even the relatively innocent concept of posting a cheerful picture on the site has become fraught with potential disaster. The problem is that photos are often tagged with date and location information, which it is not necessarily a good thing to share if the pic is of your fancy car parked in front of your home (as a member of the Mythbusters TV show discovered). 
  8. More disturbing yet, face-recognition algorithms are being applied to some photos online. So if someone has identified you in one photo, programs may fan out and automatically tag you in others (at least one erroneous photo of me keeps cropping up online, putting me at an event that I did not in fact attend).
  9. Perhaps Facebook's biggest problem, however, is that it's too bloated to manage any more. Just ask yourself how many times you've hesitated to post some snarky remark because it might be misinterpreted by some FB "friends"? Or thought twice about sharing a vacation picture because an old boyfriend or girlfriend or jealous business colleague might see it? Or even decided not to add a funny shot of your child to your digital album because, well, you don't know who's out there.
  10. The truth is, once you accumulate a certain number of FB friends, you can't be sure who will see what you post -- or what they're going to do with it. And that's Facebook's biggest problem going forward.
  11. Facebook fans will point out that there are ways to solve these social-networking problems. You can set up multiple accounts, for example, and use one profile for business, another for friends. Or you can restrict subgroups of friends from seeing certain comments or pictures by setting up separate friend lists. 
  12. In other words, you can create one list of only family members, another list of business friends, and presumably another list of your "real" friends. Then when you post something, you only post it to the appropriate list (a photo of you playing beer pong, friends only; a shot of you moderating an important business panel, definitely family friendly).
  13. There are several problems with this approach, however. It's about as easy to use as the blinking cursor on an old-school computer -- and about as much fun. It's also not reliable; Facebook keeps changing its privacy settings, so unless you stay on top of the changes you may end up sharing more than you planned. 
  14. Moreover, managing a variety of lists can quickly become a part-time job. You have to remember to move people from one list to another, should their relationship with you change; today's friend is tomorrow's frenemy, after all. And just try explaining to someone why they are on the "co-workers" list and not on your "friends" list. Even remembering who is on which list is a problem. 
  15. Complexity is the enemy of social networking, and complexity is killing Facebook. The beauty of the ancient bulletin board systems from the eighties was that there were so few people on them you didn't need to worry. And no one thought about using something you posted against you in a job interview; they flamed you in ALL CAPS and that was that.
  16. Facebook realizes it has a problem. There's already a "what's the next big thing?" vibe permeating its pages, as if everyone knows we've stopped honestly sharing things on the site because we're either too fearful or simply tired of friending and unfriending romantic partners (or just unfriending people who post too many funny possum videos -- you know who you are). 
  17. So the site is trying its hand at e-mail. It's also trying to work more closely with the world's largest Internet calling service, Skype, and in the process made exactly the same mistakes as eBay. It's even tried to mimic location-based services like Foursquare. None of these moves has been particularly successful.
  18. On the other hand, when Facebook tries to use all that valuable customer information it has accumulated to make money, users holler bloody murder -- and security experts decry any changes as an incursion against our personal liberties. Just wait until Netflix connects to Facebook and the company tries to track all the movies and programs you watch. When you're as big as Facebook, people notice when you start selling their likes and dislikes.
  19. So you can't use Facebook for fun any more. It's also not really for business. And it certainly isn't a safe place to pick up a date. So is the Facebook fad already over?
  20. A lot of big money is betting that the answer is "not yet." But there's no such thing as brand loyalty on the Internet. Remember Prodigy? Remember Pointcast? Remember AOL and Yahoo? They were are all darlings of the digital age, too. 
  21. FB friends can be fickle, and if people from my list of truly cool FB friends join another site, I'll probably go too. After all, nobody wants to miss the next big thing.


STUDY: Facebook Can Increase Risk Of Eating Disorders

From:
http://www.allfacebook.com/study-facebook-increases-risk-of-eating-disorders-for-some-2011-02

Posted by Jackie Cohen on February 1st, 2011 



Approaching Facebook with a poor self image can exacerbate mental health problems, as a study produced by the University of Haifa found a correlation between use of the social network and eating disorders in females age 12 to 19.
The research, led by Prof. Yael Latzer, Prof. Ruth Katz and Zohar Spivak from the Faculty of Social Welfare and Health examined the effects of “media exposure and personal empowerment” on a group of 249 nonreligious Jewish females.
The girls in the study perused a fairly wide range of media — including plenty of content depicting females whose bodies have been digitally edited to look thinner than they really are. Females with low self esteem proved more vulnerable to all of these images, and researchers found the strongest link between eating disorders and Facebook.
Facebook holds up a mirror — make that a magnifying glass — to society and adds visibility to things that already happen. So with respect to eating disorders, social media gives females more opportunity to compare themselves with their peer group and others.
Ever notice how groups of females in situations that promoted comparisons between them also happen to be at least unusually thin or prone to strange eating habits, if not having outright eating disorders? It’s almost a stereotype that sorority girls have group purges after meals — my sister cited this when she transferred colleges in the hopes of leaving the Greek system.
That said, I would like to see the University of Haifa share actual numbers from the eating disorder study. And while we’re at it, additional research involving larger numbers of females could provide more conclusive findings and possibly suggest ways to use Facebook to promote better attitudes among at-risk females.
What do you think about the study finding a correlation between Facebook use and eating disorders?